OnPay
OnPay helps teams run payroll, manage compliance workflows, and reduce manual processing.
OnPay and ADP both show up when buyers search this category, but they're built for different needs. This page breaks down pricing, features, and what should actually decide this — in plain English, for buyers, not vendors. Not sure which fits? Take the quick quiz below to find out in 30 seconds.
OnPay and ADP are rarely an apples-to-apples comparison in practice. OnPay is built for small businesses that want honest flat-rate pricing and a full-service payroll experience without enterprise overhead. ADP is a broader platform that scales well past what most small businesses need and carries the pricing complexity to match. If you are running a small team and want transparent costs with responsive support, OnPay is the tighter fit. If you anticipate significant growth or need compliance coverage across many states, ADP's infrastructure may be worth the premium.
4 quick questions. Takes 30 seconds.
OnPay helps teams run payroll, manage compliance workflows, and reduce manual processing.
ADP helps people teams run core HR workflows with less manual coordination.
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, deployment, platform support, and trial availability.
OnPay and ADP are both full-service US payroll processors, but they target different buyers. OnPay is designed for small and growing businesses that want reliable, full-service payroll at an affordable, transparent price with strong customer support. ADP is designed for organizations where payroll complexity, compliance depth, and enterprise-grade infrastructure matter more than price or simplicity. The comparison sharpens at the edges of OnPay's capability ceiling.
OnPay built its reputation on two things: comprehensive payroll at a simple price point, and customer support that actually answers quickly. The platform handles automated payroll tax filing in all 50 states, multi-state payroll, contractor payments, W-2 and 1099 processing, and HR basics — all for $40/month base plus $6 per person. There are no per-state fees, no fees for contractor payments, and no feature-gated tiers. Everything is included in one flat plan.
OnPay's limitations emerge at the high end of complexity. Garnishment processing works but is less automated than ADP's dedicated garnishment management. Very large payrolls (500+ employees) with complex deduction structures, union rules, or certified payroll requirements stretch the platform. Integrations are solid for SMB tools but limited compared to ADP's enterprise ecosystem. For companies whose payroll requirements stay within the SMB range, these gaps rarely surface.
ADP's core value proposition is payroll compliance at scale. The platform's compliance team tracks federal, state, and local legislative changes and updates tax tables automatically. Multi-state tax handling, garnishment processing, workers compensation integration, union payroll rules, and certified payroll for government contractors are all native capabilities. For organizations where payroll errors carry significant legal or financial risk, ADP's infrastructure reduces that exposure.
ADP's downsides are consistent across reviews: complex and dated UI, opaque pricing, inconsistent customer support quality for mid-market accounts, and implementation timelines significantly longer than OnPay's. Companies that switch from ADP to OnPay most commonly cite support quality and pricing transparency as the reasons — the compliance infrastructure they leave behind is rarely the thing that drove them away.
OnPay publishes a single pricing tier: $40/month plus $6 per person per month, all-in. No per-state fees, no contractor fees, no tier upgrades for features. For a 30-person company, that is $220/month. The pricing is predictable and does not require a sales conversation to understand.
ADP does not publish Workforce Now pricing. Mid-market buyers report all-in costs of $20–35 per employee per month when payroll, benefits administration, and time tracking are bundled. For a 30-person company on a full ADP deployment, that could run $600–1,050/month — roughly 3–5x OnPay's cost at the same headcount. The pricing gap is real and is the primary reason SMBs choose OnPay over ADP when compliance requirements do not require ADP's specific capabilities.
OnPay's customer support is consistently rated as one of its primary advantages. US-based payroll specialists are available by phone, email, and chat with response times that buyers describe as fast and helpful compared to industry norms. When payroll questions arise — a garnishment order arrives, an employee claims a withholding error, or a state notice lands — OnPay's team is accessible without the hold times and callback queues that mid-market ADP customers commonly report.
Gusto is OnPay's most direct competitor — similar pricing, strong SMB focus, slightly more HR features, slightly weaker customer support reputation. Paychex Flex is a mid-market ADP competitor worth evaluating if you want more than OnPay but find ADP's complexity excessive. QuickBooks Payroll is the natural choice if QuickBooks is your accounting system and tight accounting integration is a priority.
OnPay is the better choice for small businesses and growing companies under 100 employees that want full-service payroll — automated tax filing in all 50 states, W-2s, multi-state support, contractor payments — at a straightforward price without complexity or a sales process. At $40/month plus $6 per person, OnPay covers payroll, basic HR, and benefits administration at a cost that is transparent and predictable. Its customer support reputation is consistently strong — US-based payroll specialists available by phone, email, and chat — which matters when payroll questions arise and quick answers are needed.
ADP is the better choice when payroll complexity, enterprise scale, or deep compliance infrastructure is the actual requirement. Garnishments, workers compensation pay-as-you-go, multi-state with frequent nexus changes, union payroll, certified payroll for government contractors, and enterprise headcount all favor ADP's infrastructure. ADP's compliance team tracks legislative changes and updates the platform automatically — at scale, this reduces compliance risk in ways that smaller providers cannot replicate.
For most companies under 150 employees comparing these two, OnPay is the practical answer. The platform handles everything a growing SMB payroll needs, the support is genuinely better, the pricing is transparent, and the implementation is faster. ADP becomes the appropriate choice as payroll complexity grows past OnPay's ceiling — typically when multi-state complexity is significant, when compliance-heavy deduction types pile up, or when headcount pushes into mid-market territory where ADP Workforce Now's broader feature set starts to pay off.
Get notified when this comparison is updated — pricing changes, new features, and editorial revisions.
For most small businesses under 100 employees, OnPay is the better value: lower cost, better customer support, transparent pricing, and full-service payroll tax filing in all 50 states. ADP becomes the stronger choice when payroll complexity grows — garnishments, workers comp integration, union payroll, or certified payroll requirements — or when headcount grows past the point where OnPay's support capacity is strained.
Yes. OnPay files federal, state, and local payroll taxes in all 50 states with no additional per-state fees. Multi-state payroll is included in the base pricing — $40/month plus $6 per person regardless of how many states your employees work in. This flat pricing model is a meaningful advantage for companies with remote employees across multiple states compared to processors that charge per state.
OnPay charges $40/month plus $6 per employee — $280/month for a 40-person company. ADP does not publish prices; mid-market all-in costs typically run $20–35 per employee per month. For the same 40-person company, ADP typically costs $800–1,400/month, roughly 3–5x OnPay. The cost gap is real and is the primary reason growing SMBs choose OnPay over ADP when their compliance requirements do not specifically demand ADP's capabilities.
Yes, OnPay handles wage garnishments including child support, tax levies, and creditor garnishments. You enter the garnishment order details and OnPay calculates the deductions and remits payments to the appropriate agencies. OnPay's garnishment handling is functional for most SMB scenarios. For organizations with high volumes of garnishments or complex multi-order priority calculations, ADP's dedicated garnishment management module is more automated and scales better.
Yes. OnPay has mobile apps for iOS and Android that cover employee self-service — pay stubs, tax forms, PTO requests, and personal information updates. The employer-facing payroll administration interface is primarily web-based and optimized for desktop, though basic payroll runs can be approved on mobile. The app quality is rated positively for employee self-service but is not the platform's primary interface for payroll administrators.
Yes. OnPay specifically supports nonprofit payroll, including FUTA exemption handling for 501(c)(3) organizations, which are exempt from federal unemployment tax. OnPay also handles the specific pay types common in nonprofit operations — stipends, reimbursements, and multi-state volunteer coordination. Nonprofits on tight budgets benefit from OnPay's transparent flat pricing versus ADP's quote-based model, which often comes in higher for smaller nonprofits than comparable for-profit companies.
Full profiles with pricing details, integrations, and editorial reviews.
OnPay
OnPay helps teams run payroll, manage compliance workflows, and reduce manual processing.
Rippling is a modern workforce platform that connects HR, IT, and payroll in one system — hire someone and their payroll starts, laptop ships, and apps provision from a single action. ADP is the largest payroll company in the world — 75 years of payroll processing, products for every company size, global payroll in 140+ countries, and an integration ecosystem that connects to everything. Rippling is where the market is going. ADP is where the market has been. Both work. The question is whether you want a unified platform or a proven payroll infrastructure. Not sure? Take the quick quiz below.
QuickBooks Payroll is a payroll add-on for businesses already running QuickBooks for accounting. ADP is a standalone payroll company with products for every business size. Most buyers comparing these two are either QuickBooks users wondering if they should add QuickBooks Payroll or go with ADP, or they're on QuickBooks Payroll and hitting limits. The deciding factor is usually complexity: if your payroll is simple and your accountant lives in QuickBooks, stay in the ecosystem. If you need multi-state, HR, benefits, workers' comp, or retirement plan management, ADP covers more ground. Not sure where you stand? Take the quick quiz below.
BambooHR and ADP both show up when buyers search this category, but they're built for different needs. This page breaks down pricing, features, and what should actually decide this — in plain English, for buyers, not vendors. Not sure which fits? Take the quick quiz below to find out in 30 seconds.
OnPay is the stronger choice for small businesses that want full-service payroll with all features included in one plan — no tiers, no upsells — at a lower total cost than Gusto's equivalent feature set. Gusto wins when integrated benefits administration (direct carrier relationships, no external broker) and onboarding workflow automation are part of the buying criteria, and the buyer is willing to pay the Plus tier premium for them. The deciding signal is budget versus feature breadth.