CaptivateIQ is sales commission software. Its SmartGrid engine loads data from CRM, ERP and HR systems and calculates commissions with logic that feels like a spreadsheet, which is why revenue operations and finance teams can build and change plans without engineering help.
Pricing model
Per seat, custom quote, one-time setup fee
Deployment
Cloud
Platforms
Web
Free trial
Demo-led sale; no trial offered
Legal name
CaptivateIQ
CaptivateIQ publishes a pricing model but no rates. The model is per seat, counting admin users and payees, with a one-time setup fee. Quotes vary with the number of payees, plan complexity and required integrations.
Additional costs are named on the pricing page: ASC 606 reporting is a separate subscription, professional implementation services are available, and support comes in tiers, with the basic tier guaranteeing a 24-hour response.
Verified from the official pricing page on September 25, 2026. View source
Editorial verdict
CaptivateIQ and Xactly Incent are the two commission platforms in this comparison, and they meet in the enterprise. The difference I see is who does the work. CaptivateIQ is designed so a RevOps analyst who thinks in spreadsheets can own plan logic in SmartGrid; Xactly leans on its configurator, its 21-year data set and a broader enterprise suite.
Pricing structure is another split. CaptivateIQ says its per-seat price does not increase over time and charges a one-time setup fee, but it sells ASC 606 reporting as an add-on. Xactly includes Commission Expense Accounting in Incent. A finance team that needs ASC 606 should price both with that module included.
The customer results CaptivateIQ publishes are specific enough to test: Gong calculating monthly commissions 60 times faster, Tipalti saving 60 hours a month, and a 47% faster commissions process on average. Ask for a reference whose data volume and plan count resemble yours, because those gains depend on how manual the starting process was.
Keep it in its lane. CaptivateIQ handles variable sales pay. Merit increases, salary bands and market benchmarks belong to Pequity, Lattice Compensation, Ravio or Compa, and many companies will run one of those beside it.
CaptivateIQ fits mid-market and enterprise companies whose RevOps or sales compensation team wants to own commission logic directly, especially in technology, financial services, medical devices, manufacturing, media and retail, the industries it lists. It works best when CRM data in Salesforce or HubSpot is reasonably clean.
A company with fewer than a few dozen payees on one simple plan may not need a dedicated commission platform yet, and a company whose leadership wants territories, quotas, forecasting and payouts bought as one enterprise suite with ASC 606 included should put Xactly Incent on the same shortlist.
What stands out is SmartGrid, CaptivateIQ's combined data transformation and calculation engine. It lets admins build commission logic in a familiar grid format rather than a proprietary rules language, and AI agents help troubleshoot formulas. Customer results on its site include Gong calculating monthly commissions 60 times faster and Tipalti saving 60 hours a month.
Buyers are usually RevOps and finance together. CaptivateIQ has raised a $100 million Series C at a $1.25 billion valuation, led by ICONIQ Growth, Accel and Sequoia, so it is a well-funded independent vendor rather than part of a larger suite.
Because it is independent, CaptivateIQ does not come bundled with an HRIS or payroll contract. That keeps the buying decision focused on commissions, but it also means payroll handoff has to be designed: agree early which system produces the final payout file and who signs it off each period.
CaptivateIQ solves a specific problem: automating complex, multi-variable sales commission plans with minimal RevOps overhead. If your comp problem is base pay or equity, look elsewhere.
Still comparing? Dig deeper
Incentives automates commission calculations. SmartGrid, the ELT and calculation engine underneath, pulls data from source systems and applies plan logic.
Assist with formula troubleshooting and plan optimisation.
Reps see their earnings and how they were calculated, reducing disputes.
Planning handles sales planning and territory management. Catalyst is a predictive machine learning layer for modeling plan outcomes.
Test plan changes before rollout; CaptivateIQ cites 6x faster plan creation.
The company cites a 10% increase in seller attainment among customers.
Data arrives from Salesforce, HubSpot, NetSuite and Workday, or via API. ASC 606 reporting is available as an add-on.
Salesforce and HubSpot supply deal data; NetSuite connects commission results to finance systems.
APIs cover data sources outside the named connectors, such as billing or product usage systems.
Evaluating CaptivateIQ means separating what sounds strong in the demo from what holds up after implementation for employee compensation management teams.
Where CaptivateIQ earns its place for mid-market teams
SmartGrid uses a spreadsheet-like approach, so analysts can build and change plans without waiting on IT or the vendor. Showpad reports rolling out new plans in two days.
CaptivateIQ says per-seat pricing does not increase over time, which helps multi-year budgeting.
CaptivateIQ Planning covers territories and quotas, and Catalyst adds predictive modeling on the same data.
Salesforce, HubSpot, NetSuite and Workday are supported, with APIs for other sources.
More than 1,000 companies use it according to CaptivateIQ, including One Medical, Vimeo, 6sense, Expedia and Boston Scientific, which makes it easier to find a reference in your industry.
What to press on in CaptivateIQ pricing calls before signing
ASC 606 reporting is an add-on subscription, where Xactly includes commission expense accounting in Incent.
Only the pricing model is public; actual per-seat rates and setup fees require a quote.
Base pay cycles, bands and market data are outside scope, so HR will need a separate comp tool.
SmartGrid can transform messy inputs, but commission accuracy still depends on clean opportunity, booking and payroll data. Teams with inconsistent CRM hygiene should budget time for cleanup before go-live.
Leave your details and we'll connect you with CaptivateIQ so they can share current pricing, packaging, and what the buying process looks like.
Because payees and admins both count, a company paying 200 reps with 5 RevOps admins is quoting 205 seats. Include overlay roles, sales engineers and managers on variable plans, since leaving them out undercounts the contract.
The one-time setup fee is separate from professional implementation services. Ask which plan builds, data integrations and parallel runs the setup fee covers, and which require a services order.
The basic tier's 24-hour response window may be too slow in the days before a payroll cutoff. If commissions are paid monthly, price the higher support tier into the comparison.
Before you sign
CaptivateIQ sells through demos and custom quotes. The evaluation should prove that your RevOps team, not the vendor, can maintain the plans.
Have your own RevOps analyst build one real plan in SmartGrid during the evaluation, because the product's main promise is that your team can own the logic.
Price ASC 606 reporting in the first quote if finance needs it, because it is an add-on and leaving it out makes CaptivateIQ look cheaper than Xactly on paper.
Ask what the one-time setup fee covers versus paid implementation services, because the two are listed separately on the pricing page.
Choose a support tier based on your payroll calendar, because the basic tier's 24-hour response may not be fast enough before monthly cutoffs.
CaptivateIQ uses per-seat pricing for admins and payees plus a one-time setup fee. Rates are quoted based on payees, plan complexity and integrations.
ASC 606 reporting is offered as an add-on subscription.
SmartGrid is CaptivateIQ's ELT and calculation engine, which lets admins build commission logic in a spreadsheet-like format.
Salesforce, HubSpot, NetSuite and Workday, plus APIs for custom sources.
No. Captivate, the out-of-home advertising company that National CineMedia agreed to buy in 2026, is unrelated to CaptivateIQ.
RevOps, sales compensation and finance teams at more than 1,000 companies, per the vendor, including Gong, Tipalti, Showpad, Expedia and Stifel.
CaptivateIQ's main alternative is another commission platform; the other two options below cover different kinds of pay and often run beside it.
| Product | Pricing | Free trial |
|---|---|---|
| CaptivateIQThis tool | Per seat, custom quote, one-time setup fee | No |
| Carta | Flat fee / tiered annual | No |
| CompTool | Freemium | Yes |
| Compa | Quote-based | No |
| Pave | Per employee per month | Yes |
| Ravio | Quote-based | No |
Equity and total compensation management platform for private companies managing cap tables, pay bands, and total rewards.
Compensation benchmarking and planning tool built by comp practitioners, with a free tier for salary survey owners.
AI-native compensation platform with analyst and partner agents that scale comp expertise to recruiting and HR decisions.
Pave handles base pay benchmarking and merit planning, which companies often run alongside CaptivateIQ for non-sales compensation.
Ravio is a London-based compensation platform for tech companies, centred on salary benchmarks that update through live connections to more than 100 HR systems.
Before you decide
Compensation bands establish the pay range for each role or level in your organization. Without them, compensation decisions are inconsistent and difficult to defend. This guide covers how to build bands from scratch using market data, how wide they should be, and how to communicate them to managers and employees.
Compensation planning in spreadsheets works until it doesn't — usually at the moment when HR needs to defend a merit increase decision, run an equity analysis, or coordinate a company-wide comp cycle across multiple managers. This guide covers what compensation management software actually does and when to buy it.
