Lano logo

Lano Review — European-Headquartered EOR, Contractor Management, and Global Payroll

Lano is a European-headquartered global employment platform that combines Employer of Record services, contractor management, and global payroll for companies hiring across 170+ countries. Based in Berlin, Lano differentiates from US-headquartered competitors like Deel and Remote by emphasizing European employment law expertise, GDPR-native data handling, and deep familiarity with the complex multi-country hiring landscape that European companies face when building distributed teams across the EU and beyond.

What makes Lano worth reviewing in 2026 is the European angle. Most EOR platforms are built from a US perspective — designed primarily for American companies hiring abroad. Lano is built from a European perspective, which means its default assumptions about data privacy, employment law complexity, works council requirements, and statutory benefit structures align with how European companies think about international hiring. My review covers where the European positioning delivers genuine advantages, where the $550/month EOR fee compares to competitors, and whether the platform's multi-product approach (EOR + contractors + payroll) creates real value for European buyers.

Lano uses per employee per month for eor; per contractor per month for contractor management; custom for global payroll pricing, runs on cloud, supports Web, and Demo-led; free platform access for contractor payments in some tiers.

Demo-led; free platform access for contractor payments in some tiers. No commitment required.

Written by Maya PatelFact-checked by ChandrasmitaLast updated Mar 22, 2026

Pricing model

Per employee per month for EOR; per contractor per month for contractor management; custom for global payroll

Deployment

Cloud

Supported platforms

Web

Trial status

Demo-led; free platform access for contractor payments in some tiers

Review rating

Not yet rated

Vendor

Lano

Interested?

Interested in Lano?

Leave your details and we'll connect you with Lano so they can share current pricing, packaging, and what the buying process looks like.

No spam. Only meaningful updates for this page.

Lano pricing, EOR fees, and contractor management costs for European employers

Lano's EOR pricing starts at $550 per employee per month, published on lano.io/pricing. Contractor management starts at $30 per contractor per month. Global payroll for companies with existing entities is available through custom pricing. The EOR rate positions Lano $49/month below Deel and Remote ($599) and $351/month above Remofirst ($199).

For European companies, the pricing comparison should factor in the qualitative differences. Lano's European headquarters means GDPR compliance is built into the data architecture, not retrofitted. European employment law expertise — works councils, collective bargaining, country-specific termination procedures — is core competency rather than an add-on. For companies hiring across Germany, France, Netherlands, Spain, and other EU markets simultaneously, this expertise reduces the compliance risk that makes multi-country European hiring particularly complex.

See the full Lano pricing breakdown

EOR: From $550/employee/mo ()
Contractors: From $30/contractor/mo ()
Global Payroll: Custom pricing ()
Enterprise: Custom pricing ()

Verified from the official pricing page on March 17, 2026. View source

Why Lano stands out for European companies with multi-country hiring needs

My take on Lano is that it is the strongest EOR choice for European-headquartered companies that are expanding across the EU and into global markets. The European DNA is not just marketing — it shows up in GDPR-compliant data architecture, deep understanding of European employment law nuances (works councils, collective bargaining agreements, country-specific termination protections), and a support team that operates in European time zones and languages.

The $550/month EOR fee sits between Remofirst ($199) and Deel/Remote ($599). That mid-market positioning makes sense: you pay less than the market leaders but get a platform that understands European employment complexity better than budget alternatives. The contractor management at $30/month is competitively priced against Deel ($49) and close to Remote ($29).

Where Lano falls short is in brand recognition and ecosystem breadth compared to Deel. Deel has the broadest product suite, the most user reviews, and the strongest brand in the EOR space. Lano is the better choice for European companies that need EU-specific expertise, but it lacks the ancillary products (free HRIS, equipment provisioning, immigration support, Deel Card) that make Deel a one-stop shop.

If your company is headquartered in Europe, hiring across multiple EU countries, and values a provider that thinks about employment from a European legal and cultural perspective, Lano deserves first-look status on your shortlist.

Lano is best for

Lano is best for European-headquartered companies expanding across the EU and into global markets. It fits businesses that need an EOR provider with native understanding of European employment law complexity — works councils, collective bargaining, GDPR, and the country-specific statutory requirements that make hiring across Europe uniquely challenging.

If your company is based in Germany, Netherlands, France, or another EU country, and you are hiring across multiple European markets plus selected global markets, Lano's European perspective and timezone-aligned support create advantages that US-headquartered providers do not naturally provide.

The platform is particularly strong for companies managing a mixed workforce of EOR employees and contractors across European markets, where the combined EOR + contractor pricing is competitive and the compliance expertise covers both employment types.

Why Lano stands out

Lano stands out because it is built from a European perspective for European buyers. While Deel and Remote serve European companies, their platforms, compliance teams, and default assumptions are optimized for US-headquartered companies expanding internationally. Lano's Berlin headquarters means European employment law is the foundation, not an aftermarket addition.

The practical advantages of this European focus include GDPR-native data handling (data processed and stored in EU-compliant infrastructure), support teams in European time zones, and deep expertise in the employment law complexities that are uniquely European — works councils in Germany, collective bargaining in France, social security coordination across EU countries for cross-border workers.

The multi-product offering (EOR + contractors + global payroll) means European companies can manage their entire international workforce through one platform, with the added benefit that the transition from EOR to entity-based payroll stays within the same system as the company matures its international presence.

Commercial fit for Lano

Commercially, Lano positions itself as the European-first alternative to US-dominated EOR platforms. The positioning resonates with European companies that have experienced the friction of working with US-headquartered providers — support availability during European business hours, understanding of EU-specific employment concepts, and GDPR compliance that is architectural rather than bolted on.

The commercial fit weakens for companies that need the broadest possible product ecosystem. Deel's suite of ancillary products (free HRIS, equipment provisioning, immigration support, earned wage access) exceeds what Lano offers. Companies that want a single vendor for every aspect of global employment may find Lano's focused offering incomplete.

The strongest commercial fit is for European companies with 10-500 employees that are actively expanding across the EU and selected global markets. These buyers value European compliance expertise, timezone-aligned support, and GDPR-native infrastructure over the broader but less Europe-focused product suites offered by US-headquartered competitors.

Lano sits in the Employer of Record Software category. Browse all employer of record software tools to see how it compares to the full shortlist.

Lano in depth

Lano is best evaluated in the context of the specific people operations workflows your team is trying to improve.

Shortlist quality depends less on surface-level feature parity and more on how well Lano fits your operating model, reporting expectations, and the amount of change management your people team can absorb. Use this page to understand fit before moving into direct vendor comparisons.

  • Test whether Lano supports the workflows that matter in the next 90 days.
  • Validate pricing mechanics against actual headcount, payroll, or manager usage assumptions.
  • Check whether the implementation path matches your internal resourcing and change timeline.

Lano features: EOR, contractor payments, global payroll, GDPR, and workforce management

Lano Employer of Record and European hiring compliance

Lano's EOR service enables companies to hire full-time employees in 170+ countries without establishing local legal entities.

Lano's EOR service enables companies to hire full-time employees in 170+ countries without establishing local legal entities. As a European-headquartered provider, the platform has particular depth in EU employment markets, including handling works council requirements, collective bargaining agreement compliance, and the complex statutory benefit structures that characterize European employment.

Employment contracts are generated based on local labor law requirements, with jurisdiction-specific terms for working hours, PTO entitlements, probation periods, notice periods, and severance provisions. For European markets, contracts incorporate additional requirements like works council notification, collective bargaining agreement terms, and country-specific mandatory benefits.

Lano EOR European market expertise and works council handling

In countries like Germany, Netherlands, and Austria, employment decisions may require works council consultation. Lano's European-headquartered team understands these requirements natively, handling the notification, consultation, and documentation processes that works council interactions require. This expertise reduces the compliance risk that non-European providers may navigate less fluently.

Lano EOR global coverage beyond Europe

While European markets are the core strength, Lano covers 170+ countries globally. The global coverage means European companies expanding into APAC, LATAM, and other regions can use Lano as a single EOR provider. The depth of expertise in non-European markets should be validated for specific target countries during evaluation.

Lano contractor management and multi-currency payments

Lano's contractor management product handles the full lifecycle of independent contractor relationships at $30/month per contractor.

Lano's contractor management product handles the full lifecycle of independent contractor relationships at $30/month per contractor. The platform generates locally compliant contractor agreements, manages invoices, processes multi-currency payments, and provides compliance checks to reduce misclassification risk.

For European companies engaging contractors across EU markets, the platform handles VAT requirements, contract law differences between EU member states, and payment regulations that vary by jurisdiction. The pricing is competitive with Remote ($29/month) and significantly below Deel ($49/month).

Lano contractor compliance and EU-specific considerations

The platform assesses contractor relationships against local legal criteria, flagging arrangements at risk of reclassification as employment. In EU markets with aggressive misclassification enforcement — Germany, Netherlands, Spain — proper classification is critical. Lano's European expertise covers the specific criteria that EU member states use to distinguish contractors from employees.

Lano contractor payment processing across currencies

Contractors receive payments in their preferred currency, with the platform handling conversion and local banking requirements. Payment processing supports multiple methods and currencies, enabling companies to pay contractors across global markets from a centralized platform.

Lano global payroll for companies with local entities

Lano's global payroll product processes payroll for companies that have established legal entities in target countries.

Lano's global payroll product processes payroll for companies that have established legal entities in target countries. The product covers payroll calculation, tax withholding, statutory filing, and payment distribution through the company's own entity. Pricing is custom and based on number of entities, employee count, and complexity.

Global payroll is the natural next step for European companies that start with Lano EOR and establish entities as headcount in specific EU countries grows. The transition from EOR to entity-based payroll keeps payroll processing on the same platform, maintaining data continuity and consolidated reporting.

Lano multi-country payroll consolidation

For European companies with entities across multiple EU countries, Lano consolidates payroll processing into a single dashboard. Each country's payroll is processed according to local requirements — tax tables, statutory contribution rates, filing deadlines — while giving finance teams a unified view of payroll costs across the entire EU workforce.

Lano payroll compliance and statutory filing

The platform handles local tax calculations, statutory contribution processing, and required filings with tax authorities in each payroll entity jurisdiction. Year-end reporting, employee tax documents, and audit-ready records are generated automatically.

Lano GDPR compliance and data protection architecture

As a European company, Lano processes employment data within GDPR-compliant infrastructure by default.

As a European company, Lano processes employment data within GDPR-compliant infrastructure by default. Employee personal data — salaries, tax identifiers, bank details, health information, national ID numbers — is handled according to EU data protection requirements without the additional data processing agreements and cross-border transfer mechanisms that US-headquartered providers require.

For European companies subject to GDPR, this native compliance simplifies the data protection assessment and reduces the legal overhead of validating that employment data processing meets regulatory requirements. This is particularly important for companies in regulated industries where data protection scrutiny is heightened.

Lano EU data residency and processing guarantees

Employment data is processed and stored within EU-compliant infrastructure, meeting the data residency requirements that many European companies and regulated industries mandate. This eliminates the need for Standard Contractual Clauses or other legal mechanisms required for international data transfers to non-EU providers.

Lano data protection impact assessment support

For companies required to conduct Data Protection Impact Assessments on their employment data processing, Lano provides documentation and cooperation as a European data processor. The GDPR-native architecture simplifies the DPIA process compared to evaluating non-EU providers.

Lano platform interface and workforce management

The Lano platform provides a unified dashboard for managing EOR employees, contractors, and entity-based payroll across countries.

The Lano platform provides a unified dashboard for managing EOR employees, contractors, and entity-based payroll across countries. The interface covers onboarding, contract management, payroll approval, PTO tracking, and expense management. The design emphasizes clarity and multi-country workforce visibility.

For companies managing a mixed workforce across multiple European and global markets, the consolidated view shows employment type, location, contract status, and payroll schedules for every worker in the organization. This cross-country visibility is essential for European companies with complex multi-country employment structures.

Lano multi-country workforce dashboard

The dashboard provides a country-by-country view of the workforce, showing EOR employees, contractors, and entity-based employees in each jurisdiction. Filter and reporting capabilities let HR and finance teams segment workforce data by employment type, country, department, and cost center.

Lano reporting and payroll cost analytics

Reporting covers headcount, payroll costs, contractor spending, and total workforce costs across countries and employment types. The analytics support budget planning, financial reporting, and cost optimization decisions for multi-country operations.

Lano integrations and European software ecosystem

Lano integrates with HRIS platforms, accounting tools, and communication systems commonly used by European companies.

Lano integrates with HRIS platforms, accounting tools, and communication systems commonly used by European companies. The integration ecosystem supports data synchronization between Lano and the other tools in a company's HR and finance technology stack.

For European companies using tools like Personio, SAP SuccessFactors, DATEV, or other European-focused business software, Lano's integration priorities may align more naturally than US-headquartered providers that prioritize integrations with US-focused platforms.

Lano HRIS and accounting platform integrations

Pre-built integrations sync employee data with popular HRIS platforms and push payroll cost data to accounting systems. For European companies using DATEV for accounting or Personio for HR, integration availability should be confirmed during evaluation as it varies by platform and tier.

Lano API and custom integration support

API access supports custom integrations for companies with proprietary systems or specific data flow requirements. The API enables programmatic access to employee, contractor, and payroll data for organizations building custom workflows or reporting pipelines.

Lano pros and cons: European expertise, GDPR compliance, pricing, and ecosystem scope

Evaluating Lano means separating what sounds strong in the demo from what holds up after implementation for employer of record software teams.

Strengths

Where Lano earns its place on the shortlist for smb teams once practical fit matters more than feature breadth.

Lano European headquarters provides native GDPR compliance and EU data handling

As a Berlin-headquartered company, Lano processes and stores employment data within EU-compliant infrastructure by default. GDPR compliance is architectural — built into the platform's data handling from the ground up — rather than a compliance layer added to a US-designed system. For European companies subject to GDPR, this native compliance reduces the data protection risk inherent in sharing employee data with non-EU providers.

The distinction matters because employment data includes highly sensitive personal information: salaries, tax identifiers, health information, bank details, and national ID numbers. European data protection authorities have increasingly scrutinized international data transfers, and using a European-headquartered provider simplifies the legal basis for data processing.

For companies with strict data protection requirements — financial services, healthcare, government contractors — Lano's European data handling provides compliance assurance that US-headquartered alternatives require additional data processing agreements to match.

Lano European employment law expertise covers works councils, collective bargaining, and complex terminations

European employment law is uniquely complex compared to other regions. Works councils in Germany require consultation on hiring and termination decisions. French collective bargaining agreements layer additional requirements on top of statutory labor law. Dutch dismissal procedures require UWV (employee insurance agency) or court approval. Lano's team has deep expertise in these European-specific requirements because they are the daily reality of the company's home market.

For a European company hiring across Germany, France, Netherlands, Spain, and Italy simultaneously, the compliance complexity multiplies. Each country has different termination procedures, benefit mandates, working time regulations, and collective bargaining structures. A provider with native European expertise navigates these differences without the learning curve that US-headquartered providers must overcome.

This expertise is hardest to replicate and most valuable in termination scenarios, where errors in procedure can result in unfair dismissal claims, mandatory reinstatement, and significant financial penalties.

Lano combined EOR plus contractor management pricing is competitive for mixed workforces

For companies managing both EOR employees and contractors, Lano's combined pricing ($550/month EOR + $30/month contractor) totals $580/month per mixed worker — less than Deel's equivalent ($599 + $49 = $648). The $68/month per worker savings adds up for companies with a balanced mix of employees and contractors.

The contractor management at $30/month is competitively priced and covers contract generation, compliance checks, invoice management, and multi-currency payments. For European companies engaging contractors across EU markets, the platform handles varying VAT requirements and contract law differences.

The ability to manage both EOR employees and contractors on the same platform simplifies the transition when companies convert high-performing contractors to full-time employees — a common progression that avoids the friction of moving between separate vendor platforms.

Lano global payroll consolidation supports the EOR-to-entity transition

Lano's multi-product approach (EOR + contractors + global payroll) means companies can start with EOR for initial international hires and transition to entity-based payroll as headcount grows, all within the same platform. The global payroll product processes payroll for companies with established entities, handling tax compliance, statutory contributions, and payment distribution.

This transition path is important for growing European companies that establish entities in their highest-headcount markets. Moving from EOR ($550/month per employee) to entity-based payroll (custom pricing, typically significantly lower) saves money at scale while keeping payroll processing on the same platform.

The consolidated view across EOR employees, contractors, and entity-based payroll employees gives finance teams a single dashboard for global workforce costs — a significant operational advantage over managing separate vendors for each employment type.

Lano support operates in European time zones with multilingual capabilities

Lano's support team operates from European time zones, which means European companies get same-day responses during their business hours. This seems basic but is a genuine advantage over US-headquartered providers where European clients' afternoon questions may not get responses until the next business day.

The support team includes multilingual capabilities for European languages, which matters for compliance discussions that reference country-specific legal concepts, employment terms, and regulatory requirements that translate imprecisely between languages.

For a company's HR team in Munich or Amsterdam, being able to discuss German works council requirements or Dutch dismissal procedures with a support agent who understands these concepts natively reduces the communication friction and compliance risk inherent in cross-cultural support interactions.

Lano 170+ country coverage provides global reach from a European base

With coverage in 170+ countries, Lano matches the breadth of most global EOR providers while maintaining its European-first perspective. The coverage means European companies can hire not just across the EU but into APAC, LATAM, Middle East, and Africa through a single platform.

The combination of deep European expertise and broad global coverage addresses the most common expansion pattern for European companies: first expanding across the EU, then into UK, then into global markets as the business grows.

For European companies with 60% of hires in EU markets and 40% globally, Lano provides deep home-market expertise plus sufficient global coverage — a combination that US-headquartered providers match on breadth but not on European depth.

Limitations

What to press on in Lano pricing calls and technical validation before treating it as a safe choice for cloud deployment.

Lano brand recognition is lower than Deel and Remote in the global EOR market

Deel and Remote dominate EOR brand recognition, particularly among US and UK companies. Lano is better known in the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) and among European companies, but has less visibility in the broader global market. Fewer user reviews on G2 and Capterra make it harder for buyers outside Europe to validate the platform through peer experience.

Brand recognition affects both buyer confidence and employee perception. Candidates receiving employment contracts from Deel or Remote may feel more confident in the employment arrangement than contracts from a less recognized provider.

For European companies, Lano's brand recognition is stronger and the European credentials are well-established. For US or APAC companies considering Lano, the lower brand visibility may require additional due diligence to build confidence.

Lano global payroll pricing is custom and not published, complicating cost modeling

While EOR and contractor pricing are published, global payroll pricing requires custom quotes. This means companies cannot model the long-term cost trajectory — starting with EOR and transitioning to entity-based payroll — from public information alone. Deel publishes global payroll at $29/month per employee, giving buyers a clear comparison point.

The custom pricing approach is common in enterprise payroll, but it creates friction for companies that want to evaluate the full lifecycle cost of their international employment platform. Buyers need to engage in sales conversations to understand payroll pricing, which slows the evaluation process.

During the sales process, request payroll quotes alongside EOR quotes to model the total cost of ownership as your company grows from EOR-only to a mix of EOR and entity-based payroll.

Lano product ecosystem is narrower than Deel's all-in-one suite

Deel bundles EOR, contractor management, global payroll, free HRIS, equipment provisioning, immigration support, earned wage access, and the Deel Card into one platform. Lano focuses on EOR, contractor management, and global payroll — the core employment services — without the ancillary products that Deel offers.

For companies that want a single vendor for every aspect of global employment, Lano's narrower scope means supplementing with separate vendors for HRIS (BambooHR, HiBob), equipment provisioning, and immigration support.

The focused approach keeps the platform simpler and the pricing competitive, but companies that value vendor consolidation above all else will find Lano's offering incomplete compared to Deel's broader ecosystem.

Lano EOR at $550 per month is mid-market but not the cheapest option

At $550/month per employee, Lano's EOR pricing is cheaper than Deel and Remote ($599) but significantly more expensive than Remofirst ($199) and slightly above Multiplier ($400 in select markets). For budget-conscious buyers, the $550 rate may not justify the premium over cheaper alternatives unless the European expertise provides specific value for their use case.

Ten EOR employees cost $66,000/year with Lano versus $23,880/year with Remofirst — a $42,120 annual difference. The European expertise and GDPR compliance are genuine advantages, but buyers should evaluate whether those advantages are worth $350/month per employee over the cheapest available option.

The value proposition is strongest for companies hiring in complex European markets where compliance depth matters. For companies hiring in straightforward markets (UK, Portugal, India), cheaper alternatives may provide sufficient compliance coverage at lower cost.

Lano user review volume is limited compared to established market leaders

Lano has fewer user reviews on G2, Capterra, and Trustpilot than Deel, Remote, or Oyster. This makes it harder for prospective buyers to validate platform quality, support reliability, and compliance handling through peer experience. Due diligence requires relying more heavily on vendor-provided references and demo evaluations.

The lower review volume does not necessarily indicate lower quality — it reflects the company's smaller market share and European focus. But for risk-averse buyers who rely on peer review data to validate vendor decisions, the limited review volume is a gap.

Buyers should request detailed references from current clients in their industry and target countries, and conduct a thorough demo evaluation that tests compliance handling, support responsiveness, and platform usability.

Lano plan structure and what buyers should verify

What the $550 per month EOR fee covers for European employers

The $550/month fee covers Lano acting as the legal employer in the target country, including employment contract generation, payroll processing, tax withholding, statutory benefit administration, and compliance monitoring. For European markets, this includes handling works council requirements, collective bargaining agreement compliance, and country-specific mandatory benefits that make European employment particularly complex.

The fee includes support from a European-based team operating in European time zones, which matters for companies whose HR teams are in Berlin, Amsterdam, Paris, or London. A compliance question submitted at 3pm CET gets a same-timezone response rather than waiting for US West Coast business hours.

How Lano contractor pricing at $30 per month compares to market rates

Contractor management at $30/month per contractor is competitive — slightly above Remote ($29/month) and significantly below Deel ($49/month). For companies managing a mixed workforce of EOR employees and contractors, the combined cost of Lano's EOR ($550) plus contractor management ($30) is lower than Deel's equivalent ($599 + $49 = $648).

The contractor product covers contract generation, compliance checks, invoice management, and multi-currency payment processing. For European companies engaging contractors across EU and global markets, the platform handles varying VAT requirements, contract law differences, and payment regulations across jurisdictions.

What buyers should verify about Lano global payroll pricing

Lano's global payroll product for companies with existing entities uses custom pricing, which means buyers cannot model payroll costs from public information. This contrasts with Deel's published $29/month per employee Global Payroll rate. Buyers considering Lano for the full journey — starting with EOR and transitioning to entity-based payroll — should request global payroll quotes during the initial sales process to understand the long-term cost trajectory.

Custom payroll pricing typically factors in number of entities, employee count per entity, payroll complexity, and level of support required. European companies with entities across multiple EU countries should ask for volume pricing that reflects their multi-country payroll consolidation needs.

Before you book a demo

Lano demo checklist, pricing questions, and buying motion for EU employers

If Lano is on your shortlist, the demo should focus on validating the European expertise that differentiates it from US-headquartered competitors and confirming country-specific details. Here is what to address.

1

Test the European employment law expertise with specific compliance scenarios. Bring real compliance questions to the demo — works council consultation requirements in Germany, collective bargaining agreement application in France, dismissal procedures in the Netherlands. Evaluate whether the team handles these questions fluently or needs to escalate. The European expertise is the core differentiator — validate it with scenarios that matter for your target markets. A provider that handles these questions natively is worth the premium over a US-headquartered alternative that treats European compliance as a specialty rather than a default.

2

Request country-specific total cost of employment estimates including statutory contributions. The $550/month EOR fee covers the platform cost. European statutory employer contributions vary significantly: 40-45% of salary in France, 20-22% in Germany, 30%+ in Italy. Get written estimates for each target country that include salary, Lano fees, statutory contributions, mandatory benefits, and country-specific charges. European employment is particularly expensive when statutory costs are fully loaded — do not budget based on the platform fee alone.

3

Get global payroll pricing for the entity-based transition. If your growth plan includes establishing entities in high-headcount EU countries, request global payroll quotes alongside EOR quotes. Understand the cost trajectory from EOR at $550/month to entity-based payroll at custom pricing. Deel publishes global payroll at $29/month per employee — ask Lano to compete on transparency for the payroll product.

4

Verify the depth of non-European market coverage. Lano's strength is European markets. If your hiring plan includes APAC, LATAM, or African markets, validate the depth of Lano's coverage and compliance expertise in those regions. Ask for references from clients hiring in your specific non-European target countries. A provider that is excellent in Europe but shallow in APAC may require a second EOR vendor for global markets.

Frequently asked questions about Lano EOR and European employment compliance

Question 1

Is Lano a good EOR for European companies hiring across the EU?

Yes, Lano is one of the strongest EOR options for European-headquartered companies. The Berlin headquarters means GDPR-native data handling, deep understanding of European employment law complexities (works councils, collective bargaining, country-specific termination protections), and support in European time zones. For companies expanding from Germany, Netherlands, France, or other EU bases into multiple European markets, Lano's European DNA provides compliance assurance that US-headquartered providers match on paper but may not match in depth of operational experience.

Question 2

How does Lano's $550/month EOR pricing compare to Deel and Remote?

Lano's EOR starts at $550/month per employee — $49/month cheaper than Deel and Remote ($599/month each). For ten employees, the savings are $5,880/year. The price advantage is modest compared to budget providers like Remofirst ($199/month), but the value proposition is not just price — it is European compliance expertise, GDPR-native data handling, and timezone-aligned support. Companies should evaluate Lano's European advantages against the broader product ecosystem Deel offers and determine whether the European-specific benefits justify the investment for their use case.

Question 3

Does Lano handle works council requirements in Germany and other EU countries?

Yes, Lano's team has specific expertise in works council requirements, which is expected from a Berlin-headquartered company. In Germany, works councils must be consulted on certain employment decisions including hiring and terminations. Lano handles the notification, consultation, and documentation processes. Similar requirements exist in Netherlands, Austria, and other EU countries. This expertise is one of Lano's key differentiators — US-headquartered EOR providers handle works council compliance, but it is not their home-market specialty in the same way it is for Lano.

Question 4

Is Lano's GDPR compliance meaningfully different from US-headquartered EOR providers?

The practical difference is architectural. Lano processes employment data within EU-compliant infrastructure by default because it is a European company. US-headquartered providers can achieve GDPR compliance through data processing agreements, Standard Contractual Clauses, and EU data residency commitments, but this requires additional legal documentation and ongoing validation. For companies in regulated industries or with strict data protection policies, Lano's native GDPR compliance simplifies the vendor assessment process and reduces data protection risk.

Question 5

Can Lano handle contractor management across EU countries with different VAT requirements?

Yes, Lano's contractor management product at $30/month per contractor covers contract generation, compliance checks, and multi-currency payments across EU and global markets. For EU-specific contractor management, the platform handles varying VAT requirements between member states, country-specific contract law differences, and the misclassification criteria that differ by EU country. The European expertise that applies to EOR extends to contractor management — the team understands the nuances of contractor classification across EU jurisdictions.

Question 6

Does Lano offer global payroll for companies that already have entities in EU countries?

Yes, Lano offers global payroll processing for companies with existing legal entities. The product handles payroll calculation, tax withholding, statutory filing, and payment distribution through the company's own entity. Pricing is custom and based on entity count, employee volume, and complexity. For European companies with entities in multiple EU countries, the multi-country payroll consolidation provides a unified view of payroll costs across the organization. The custom pricing approach means buyers need to request quotes — unlike Deel, which publishes global payroll at $29/month per employee.

Question 7

How does Lano support the transition from EOR to entity-based employment in EU countries?

Lano supports the common growth path of starting with EOR and transitioning to entity-based employment as headcount in a country grows large enough to justify local entity setup. The transition keeps workforce management on the same platform — employees move from Lano's legal entity to the company's own entity while payroll processing continues through Lano's global payroll product. This avoids the disruption of changing platforms during the transition. The breakeven point for entity setup versus continued EOR use varies by country but typically occurs at five to fifteen employees per market.

Lano alternatives worth comparing

Lano is the strongest EOR for European-headquartered companies, but it is not the right fit for every buyer. Here are the alternatives worth evaluating based on your specific needs.

ProductPricingDeploymentFree trialRating
LanoPer employee per month for EOR; per contractor per month for contractor management; custom for global payrollCloudNo
DeelPer-employee pricingCloudYes
RemofirstPer-employee pricingCloudNo
Safeguard GlobalCustom quoteCloudNo
OmnipresentPer-employee pricingCloudNo
SkuadPer-employee pricingCloudNo

Deel

Deel offers the broadest product ecosystem in the EOR market — EOR, contractors, payroll, HRIS, equipment, and immigration — at $599/month. Best for companies wanting maximum vendor consolidation regardless of headquarters location.

Omnipresent

Omnipresent is a UK-headquartered EOR with strong European coverage and an emphasis on employee experience. Best for European companies that prioritize the employee-facing side of the EOR relationship.

Skuad

Skuad helps people teams run core HR workflows with less manual coordination.

Related buyer guides

Read the Lano category research before it becomes your default answer.

Buyer guide

When to Switch From EOR to a Local Entity: Exit Triggers and Timing

Employer of record services are built for speed and flexibility — not for permanent infrastructure. At some point, most high-growth companies hit a threshold where the cost, control, and cultural reasons to own a local entity start to outweigh EOR convenience. This guide is about recognizing and acting on those triggers.

Buyer guide

EOR vs Contractor: Which Hiring Model Fits Better?

An employer of record is usually the safer option when the company wants a true employee relationship in another country. A contractor arrangement only works when the role is genuinely independent under local law. The real choice is not cost versus convenience. It is whether the company is trying to hire an employee or engage independent work without misclassification risk.

Buyer guide

How to Choose an Employer of Record

The best way to choose an employer of record is to compare providers on country coverage, entity quality, onboarding speed, employment support, pricing clarity, and how well they fit your actual international hiring plan. Buyers should not choose an EOR on brand recognition alone because the right provider depends heavily on country mix, hiring urgency, and what kind of support the company will really need after the contract is signed.