Breezy HR
Breezy HR is the applicant tracking system designed for small and mid-sized businesses that want a functional ATS without the enterprise complexity or enterprise pricing.
Free; paid from $157/mo (annual)CloudFree trial
Breezy HR vs Workable: Which Is Right for Your Team in 2026?
Breezy and Workable both cover the core ATS workflow — pipelines, job posting, candidate messaging — but their pricing structures diverge more than their feature lists do. Breezy's paid tiers run $157 to $439 per month billed annually ($189 to $529 billed monthly), with a free plan for one open position; Workable's run $299 to $719 per month billed annually for companies with up to 20 employees, and rise with headcount. At matched tiers, Breezy is consistently the cheaper of the two — the question is whether Workable's larger integration library and reporting depth are worth the premium for your hiring volume.
Breezy HR and Workable compete closely for SMB and early mid-market ATS buyers. Both offer pipeline management, job posting, and candidate communication in a product that is relatively quick to set up. The differentiation is subtle: Breezy tends to earn higher marks on collaboration features and visual pipeline design. Workable has a larger integration library and stronger reporting capabilities. Teams evaluating both should focus on which pain point matters more: collaborative hiring workflow or reporting and integration depth.
Breezy HR vs Workable: the short answer
Breezy and Workable overlap significantly for mid-market teams hiring 10–100 people per year, and either tool can handle the process competently. The decision pivots on two questions: where is your recruiting bottleneck, and what does your hiring volume look like?
Written by RajatRajatEditorRajat leads software evaluation at PeopleOpsClub and does the primary hands-on review work behind its software profiles, pricing breakdowns and head-to-head comparisons. He previously built and ran SpotSaaS (spotsaas.com) and Revoyant (revoyant.com), two software research and review platforms, and has spent that time working through HR and people operations products directly — signing up for trials, configuring admin settings, mapping how pricing actually scales and testing how support behaves — rather than relying on vendor collateral or aggregated review scores.|Fact-checked by ChandrasmitaChandrasmitaFact-checkerVerifies pricing claims, compliance data, and feature accuracy across HR software categories. Brings direct experience in people operations and HR technology procurement at global organisations.
Breezy HR vs Workable: what each tool does
Workable
Workable is the applicant tracking system that fast-growing SMBs reach for when they realize posting jobs on LinkedIn and managing candidates in a spreadsheet is costing them hires.
$299/mo billed annually (1-20 staff)CloudFree trial
Breezy HR vs Workable: pricing & features compared
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, deployment, platform support, and trial availability for recruiting buyers.
| Pricing | Breezy HR | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free; paid from $157/mo (annual) | $299/mo billed annually (1-20 staff) |
| Typical cost | $273/mo Growth (annual) or $329/mo monthly | $419-$500/mo Standard at 21-50 staff (est.) |
| Billing unit | flat per month, unlimited users | per month, by employee band |
| Free trial | 14-day full-feature free trial, no credit card required; free Bootstrap plan for 1 position | 15-day free trial of the Standard plan, no credit card required |
| Price transparency | Prices published by vendor | Some prices published, rest by quote |
Prices verified Sep 2026. Sources: Breezy HR pricing page, Workable pricing page, Workable: Compono: Workable pricing 2026 (Sep 2026), Workable: Pin: Workable pricing 2026 (updated Jun 2026), Workable: Vendr Workable pricing (Feb 2026).
Full plan tables: Breezy HR pricing, Workable pricing.
Starting priceFree; paid from $157/mo (annual)$299/mo billed annually (1-20 staff)
Deployment modelCloudCloud
Supported platformsWebWeb, iOS, Android
Free trial14-day full-feature free trial, no credit card required; free Bootstrap plan for 1 position15-day free trial of the Standard plan, no credit card required
Breezy HR vs Workable: key differences
Market position and buyer profile
Breezy HR and Workable are mid-market ATS platforms targeting companies between 10 and 500 employees that want more than a basic job board but less than an enterprise recruiting suite. Breezy has historically positioned around ease of use and visual pipeline management — it was an early adopter of the Kanban-style recruiting board that is now common. Workable focuses on sourcing reach and automation, with a built-in candidate database and AI-assisted job description writing that reduces time-to-post. Both are credible in the segment; they differ in where they invest their roadmap.
Job posting and candidate sourcing
Workable has a broader job distribution network — it posts to 200+ job boards including Indeed, LinkedIn, Glassdoor, and niche boards in one click. Its people search feature surfaces passive candidates from a 400M+ profile database before you post anywhere. Breezy integrates with major job boards but the distribution list is shorter. For companies where sourcing is a bottleneck — hiring engineers, specialists, or in competitive markets — Workable's sourcing infrastructure is a meaningful differentiator.
- Workable: 200+ job board integrations with one-click posting
- Workable: 400M+ passive candidate database for proactive sourcing
- Workable: AI-assisted job description writing
- Breezy: visual Kanban pipeline is fast to adopt and customize
- Breezy: strong career site builder with branded customization
- Breezy: simpler pricing model with fewer add-on costs
Pipeline and workflow management
Breezy's visual pipeline is its most-cited strength — dragging candidates between stages, configuring automated emails at each stage, and seeing the full hiring funnel at a glance. It is fast to set up and requires minimal training. Workable's pipeline is functional but more list-oriented; it works well but does not have the same visual immediacy. For recruiting teams that process high volumes of candidates and want quick visual status overviews, Breezy's board view is a genuine productivity advantage.
Collaboration and team hiring
Both tools support structured interview scorecards, hiring team feedback collection, and role-based permissions for interviewers versus decision-makers. Workable's structured hiring workflows are slightly more configurable — it supports multiple scorecard templates per role and granular stage-level permissions. Breezy's collaboration features are solid for most teams but less configurable at the role level. For organizations running structured hiring programs with multiple interviewers per role, both tools work, but Workable offers more workflow controls.
Pricing model
Breezy charges per open position — pricing scales with active job count rather than user count, which is unusual and can be advantageous for teams with variable hiring velocity. If you are only hiring for a few roles at once, Breezy's cost stays contained. Workable charges per job posted per month with plan tiers based on feature access and volume. Both offer startup-friendly entry plans, but the pricing models behave differently under bursty hiring — Breezy costs more when hiring spikes, Workable's flat plan can absorb volume better.
- 1Breezy Bootstrap: free (1 active position, limited features)
- 2Breezy Startup: $157/month billed annually, or $189/month billed monthly
- 3Breezy Growth: $273/month billed annually, or $329/month billed monthly — advanced pipeline, EEOC/OFCCP reporting, integrations
- 4Breezy Business: $439/month billed annually, or $529/month billed monthly — full feature set
- 5Breezy Bootstrap: free for one open position
- 6Workable Standard: $299/month billed annually (about $374 billed monthly) for 1-20 employees
- 7Workable Premier: $599/month billed annually for 1-20 employees
- 8Workable Enterprise: $719/month billed annually for 1-20 employees; larger headcount bands cost more
HRIS and onboarding integrations
Workable integrates with BambooHR, HiBob, Rippling, ADP, and other HR systems for automated handoff after hire. It also has a built-in offer management and e-signature workflow. Breezy integrates with similar HRIS platforms and includes offer letter templates with e-signature. Neither tool handles onboarding natively — they hand off to HRIS or dedicated onboarding systems. Verify your specific HRIS integration with both tools before deciding, as integration depth varies by system.
Where Breezy wins
- Visual Kanban pipeline that is faster to adopt and easier to demo
- Per-position pricing that contains costs during low hiring periods
- Cleaner career site builder with better branding customization
- Faster initial setup — teams are posting jobs within hours
- Good for small HR teams that value UX over sourcing depth
Where Workable wins
- Broader job distribution network with 200+ boards
- Passive candidate sourcing from a large profile database
- AI-assisted job descriptions that reduce time-to-post
- More configurable structured hiring workflows
- Better for companies where sourcing volume is the primary bottleneck
Breezy HR vs Workable: which is better for Recruiting teams?
Breezy and Workable overlap significantly for mid-market teams hiring 10–100 people per year, and either tool can handle the process competently. The decision pivots on two questions: where is your recruiting bottleneck, and what does your hiring volume look like?
If sourcing is the bottleneck — finding candidates in competitive markets, filling technical roles, or hiring at volume — Workable's built-in candidate database and broader job board distribution justify its higher base cost. Its 400M+ passive candidate profiles and one-click multi-board posting compress time-to-pipeline in a way Breezy cannot match natively.
If pipeline management and team adoption are the bottlenecks — getting hiring managers to give feedback, keeping candidates moving through stages, or building a repeatable process for the first time — Breezy's visual board and simpler interface win. It is faster to implement, easier to teach to non-HR stakeholders, and its flat per-company pricing keeps costs predictable.
Workable prices by company headcount band, so its cost rises as you grow even if hiring volume doesn't. Breezy charges a flat price per company with unlimited users, and its free Bootstrap plan covers one open position, which can suit companies with bursty or occasional hiring.
Both offer free trials. Run them simultaneously with one active role to compare candidate experience, team adoption, and workflow fit before committing.
Still deciding between Breezy HR and Workable?
Get notified when this comparison is updated — pricing changes, new features, and editorial revisions.
Frequently asked questions
Is Breezy HR or Workable better for small companies?
Both work for small companies, but Breezy's free Bootstrap plan (1 active position) makes it accessible earlier. Workable has no permanent free tier. For companies hiring 1–3 roles at a time, Breezy's pricing is more forgiving.
Which has better job board integrations?
Workable — it posts to 200+ job boards with one click versus Breezy's more limited distribution. If reaching more candidates across more platforms is a priority, Workable's posting network is a clear advantage.
Does Workable have passive candidate sourcing?
Yes. Workable's people search accesses a database of 400M+ candidate profiles for proactive outreach before you post a job. Breezy does not have an equivalent built-in passive sourcing database.
How does pricing compare for a company hiring 10 roles at once?
Breezy's Growth plan costs $273 per month billed annually or $329 billed monthly. Workable's Standard plan costs $299 per month billed annually, or about $374 billed monthly, for companies with 1 to 20 employees, and more in larger headcount bands. At that size, Breezy Growth is $26 a month cheaper on annual billing and about $45 cheaper on monthly billing, and the gap widens as your headcount moves Workable into a higher band. For teams hiring for a single role at a time, Breezy's free Bootstrap plan covers one open position.
Which has better structured interview support?
Workable offers more configurable scorecard templates and stage-level permissions, which suits organizations running formal structured hiring programs. Breezy's structured interview tools are solid but slightly less configurable at scale.
Can both tools integrate with BambooHR or HiBob after hiring?
Yes. Both Breezy and Workable integrate with BambooHR, HiBob, and other common HRIS platforms for post-hire data transfer. Verify which specific fields sync in each integration before assuming the handoff works out of the box — field mapping often needs manual setup.
Go deeper on Breezy HR and Workable
Full profiles with pricing details, integrations, and editorial reviews.
Breezy HR
Breezy HR is the applicant tracking system designed for small and mid-sized businesses that want a functional ATS without the enterprise complexity or enterprise pricing.
Workable
Workable is the applicant tracking system that fast-growing SMBs reach for when they realize posting jobs on LinkedIn and managing candidates in a spreadsheet is costing them hires.
Related comparisons
Greenhousevs
WorkableGreenhouse is better for companies that need structured, data-driven hiring — scorecards, interview kits, and a compliance-grade ATS built for dedicated recruiting teams. Workable is better for smaller teams and growing companies that want sourcing, ATS, and basic HR features in one platform with faster setup. This comparison covers pricing, structured hiring capability, sourcing tools, and what should decide the shortlist.
LevervsWorkableLever is the stronger choice for companies where collaborative hiring — structured interviewer feedback, candidate relationship management, and DEI hiring analytics — is a primary requirement, and where recruiting teams want to build and nurture talent pipelines rather than just process applications. Workable is the stronger choice for companies that prioritise fast, self-service ATS setup, broad job board syndication across 200-plus job boards, and a platform that non-specialist HR teams can run without dedicated recruiter configuration. Both serve mid-market companies well; the decision turns on whether pipeline depth or sourcing breadth is the primary recruiting challenge.