Deel
Most established EOR in Brazil with full CLT compliance
Deel operates as an EOR in Brazil through their local entity, handling the full scope of CLT obligations: employee registration with e-Social, INSS contributions (employer portion is 20% of gross salary plus RAT risk-adjusted contribution), FGTS deposits (8% of gross salary), 13th salary calculation and payment, vacation accrual and payout, and transportation and meal vouchers where required by collective bargaining agreements (CCAs).
Deel's Brazil EOR pricing starts at $599/employee/month, which covers payroll processing, tax compliance, benefits administration, and employment contract management. For companies hiring 1-10 employees in Brazil, this is significantly cheaper than establishing a CNPJ (Brazilian entity) — entity setup costs $15,000-$30,000 in legal fees alone, plus ongoing accounting and compliance costs of $2,000-$5,000/month.
Deel also provides guidance on Brazil's complex collective bargaining agreement landscape, where sindicatos negotiate industry-specific benefits and salary floors that override CLT minimums. For companies hiring developers in São Paulo under the SINDPD agreement or sales staff under the Comerciários convention, Deel's local team ensures the correct CBA is applied. Their exit management service handles the intricate termination calculation that includes FGTS 40% penalty, proportional 13th salary, accrued vacation plus one-third bonus, and advance notice pay.
Strengths in this market
- Full CLT compliance including e-Social filing and FGTS deposits
- Handles 13th salary, vacation bonus, and complex termination calculations
- Local entity in Brazil — not using a shell company arrangement
- Covers collective bargaining agreement obligations by industry
Limitations to know
- $599/employee/month is expensive for teams larger than 10 employees
- Benefits package is standardized — limited flexibility on plan customization
- Termination process in Brazil takes 30-60 days minimum — EOR adds coordination time
- Less control over local benefits compared to direct employment