tracker template · Free download
Succession Planning Template
A succession planning template to identify critical roles, name ready-now and ready-later successors, and close each candidate's readiness gap.
Sign in with Google below to download the PDF and CSV straight away.
Get your free download
Sign in with Google to unlock the PDF and CSV instantly. No form to fill in.
Free. By continuing you agree to our terms and privacy policy. We record your email and this download; marketing emails only if you tick the box.
What you get
- A critical-role register with incumbent and departure-risk fields
- A successor bench table with readiness timelines per candidate
- A readiness-gap and development-action tracker for each successor
- A checklist for running the review without it turning into a popularity contest
Template preview
A preview of the structure. Download the PDF or CSV for the complete, ready-to-use version.
Why this is different from a 9-box grid or a development plan
A 9-box grid places your whole team on a performance/potential matrix. A leadership development plan grows one person's capability. This template starts from the role, not the person — it asks 'if this seat opened tomorrow, who could step in, and when?' Use it after a 9-box review to turn high-potential placements into an actual bench.
Critical role register
List roles first, not names. A role is critical if losing the incumbent with no plan would disrupt delivery, revenue, or strategy.
| Critical role | Current incumbent | Incumbent departure risk (L/M/H) | Vacancy impact if unfilled |
|---|---|---|---|
| VP Engineering | J. Alvarez | Low | Roadmap stalls, no technical escalation path |
| Head of Sales | T. Okafor | Medium | Pipeline coverage and key accounts at risk |
Successor bench
Name one to three candidates per role. It's fine to leave a role with no ready-now successor — that's the point of tracking it.
| Critical role | Successor candidate | Readiness timeline | Risk of candidate departure |
|---|---|---|---|
| VP Engineering | R. Chen (Eng Director) | Ready now | Medium — recently approached by a competitor |
| VP Engineering | S. Patel (Senior Manager) | Ready in 3-5 years | Low |
| Head of Sales | M. Torres (Sales Director) | Ready in 1-2 years | Low |
Readiness gap and development action
For every successor, name the gap and the one action that closes it fastest.
| Successor candidate | Readiness gap | Development action | Target date | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Chen | No P&L or budget-owner experience | Give budget ownership for one engineering sub-org this quarter | Q3 | J. Alvarez |
| M. Torres | Limited exposure to board-level reporting | Shadow the QBR prep and present one section | Q4 | T. Okafor |
Emergency coverage plan
- Role
- Who covers day one if the incumbent leaves without notice
- What decisions that interim cover cannot make
- Who is briefed on this plan
This is a preview — the full template continues in the download.
Sign in above to download the full template.
How to use this template
- 1
Name the critical roles
List roles where an unplanned exit would stall the business — not every role, just the ones that matter most.
- 2
Build the bench per role
For each critical role, name one to three successor candidates and their readiness timeline: ready now, ready in 1-2 years, or ready in 3-5 years.
- 3
Close the gap
Write down what each successor is missing and the specific action that closes it — a stretch assignment, exposure, or a skill.
- 4
Review twice a year
Revisit the register with leadership every six months. Roles change, people leave, and readiness moves.
Frequently asked questions
How is a succession planning template different from a 9-box grid?
A 9-box grid rates your whole team on performance and potential. Succession planning starts from specific critical roles and asks who could step into each one and when. Use the 9-box to spot high-potential people, then use this template to slot them against real roles with a readiness timeline.
Which roles need a succession plan?
Focus on roles where an unplanned exit would stall delivery, revenue, or strategy — not every role in the org. A good filter: would the business notice within 30 days if this person left with no plan in place?
What if a critical role has no ready-now successor?
That's the most useful output of the exercise, not a failure. It tells you exactly where to invest in development or where you may need to hire externally to build a bench before the risk becomes real.
Should successor candidates know they're being considered?
Generally yes, at least at the ready-now and ready-in-1-2-years stages. Being told you're on the bench is a retention lever and lets you assign real development actions with the person's buy-in rather than in secret.