How do remote teams handle high applicant volume?
They use knockout questions, AI screening or structured scorecards to rank applicants before interviews. Tools with automated scheduling also save hours of back-and-forth across calendars.
Best Recruiting Software for Remote Teams
Recruiting and ATS tools for companies hiring into home-based roles, with async interviews, scheduling across calendars and large applicant pools.
What this audience should prioritize
A remote job posting can attract applicants from an entire country, so volume and screening become the main problem. Interviews run over video, and scheduling across panels in different time zones eats recruiter time. Structured scorecards help keep decisions fair when interviewers never meet the candidate in person.
Greenhouse is built around structured interviews and scorecards, suits companies hiring 50 or more people a year, and is estimated from about $5,100 a year for small teams. Ashby combines ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics, with pricing starting around $400 a month on its Foundations tier.
For smaller remote companies, Workable offers AI screening and a 400-million-profile sourcing database from $299 a month billed annually for companies with up to 20 employees, and Breezy HR has a free plan for one active position. Manatal uses AI candidate recommendations at $15 per user per month.
Shortlist candidates for Remote Teams
Published price means the vendor shows a figure; quote only means it does not. The best-fit and tradeoff lines are each tool's own.
Showing 20 of 20
| Tool | Published price | Best for | Main tradeoff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinpoint | ~$600-$800/month (estimated) | Best for internal recruiting teams that want recruiting software to improve candidate experience and employer brand, not just move applicants through stages. | The tradeoff is that Pinpoint is more candidate-experience-first than sourcing-automation-first or analytics-first, so priorities need to be clear before buying. |
| Gem | $270/mo billed annually (Startups) | Gem is best for dedicated recruiting teams of five or more recruiters where outbound sourcing accounts for 30 percent or more of total hires and where measuring sourcing effectiveness is a strategic priority for talent acquisition leadership. | Gem is an add-on cost on top of your existing ATS which doubles the recruiting tech budget |
| Breezy HR | Free; paid from $157/mo (annual) | Breezy HR is best for small and mid-sized businesses with 10 to 200 employees that hire 5 to 50 people per year and need an ATS that hiring managers and HR generalists can use without formal training or dedicated recruiting operations support. | Breezy HR analytics are functional but do not provide strategic recruiting insights |
| Manatal | $15/user/month | Best for SMB recruiting teams and growing talent functions that want recruiting software with low entry cost, quick setup, and useful AI assistance. | The tradeoff is that Manatal gives you value and speed first, not the deepest analytics or the heaviest enterprise process controls. |
| ClearCompany | ~$6-$8 PEPM (estimated) | Best for mid-market HR teams that want recruiting software with stronger continuity into onboarding and talent management rather than a narrow front-end recruiting tool. | The tradeoff is that the platform wins more on lifecycle continuity than on category-leading depth inside every individual recruiting workflow. |
| Zoho Recruit | quote only | Best for recruiting teams and staffing groups that want software they can adapt with automation, portals, and Zoho ecosystem connections. | The tradeoff is that more flexibility can mean more setup and more administration, so the team should want the extra control before buying it. |
| Recruit CRM | $95 per user/mo billed annually (Business $135, Enterprise $215) | Best for recruitment firms and search teams that want recruiting software built around both candidate flow and client relationship management. | The tradeoff is that Recruit CRM is agency-native, so internal TA teams should verify that the workflow is not more agency-shaped than they need. |
| Boon | quote only | Best for talent teams that want recruiting software to activate referral hiring at scale and improve the speed and quality of referred candidates. | The tradeoff is that Boon works best as part of a recruiting stack, not as the only recruiting platform a team relies on. |
| BambooHRSponsored | $10 per employee/mo ($250/mo minimum) | BambooHR is best for HR generalists and people operations managers at companies with 25 to 300 employees who need a single platform for employee records, onboarding, time tracking, and performance reviews. | BambooHR scalability ceiling hits hard around 300–500 employees |
| RipplingSponsored | ~$8/employee/mo + $35-$40/mo (est.) | Rippling is best for technology-forward companies with 50 to 2,000 employees that want to manage HR, IT, and finance operations from a single platform. It fits teams with a technical operations mindset: the kind of company where the head of people operations thinks in systems and workflows rather than forms and approvals. | Rippling setup complexity requires significant implementation investment |
| Workable | $299/mo billed annually (1-20 staff) | Workable is best for talent acquisition teams and HR managers at fast-growing SMBs with 50 to 500 employees that have active, ongoing hiring needs. It fits companies that post multiple roles simultaneously, want AI assistance with candidate screening and sourcing, and need a single platform that covers recruiting through onboarding. | Workable pricing penalizes small teams with low hiring volume relative to headcount |
| JazzHR | $1,000/yr (Hero, billed annually) | JazzHR is best for small business owners, HR managers, and office administrators at companies with 10 to 100 employees who handle hiring alongside other responsibilities. | JazzHR sourcing capabilities are nearly nonexistent for proactive recruiting |
| Ashby | $400/mo (up to 100 employees) | Ashby is best for tech companies and startups with 50 to 1,000 employees that hire actively and want a single platform for applicant tracking, candidate relationship management, interview scheduling, and recruiting analytics. | Ashby's size-based pricing penalizes large companies with low hiring volume |
| GreenhouseSponsored | ~$5,100/yr for small teams (est.) | Greenhouse is best for dedicated recruiting teams and talent acquisition leaders at companies with 100 to 5,000 employees who hire 50 or more people per year and care about hiring quality and process consistency. | Greenhouse pricing is a premium that smaller teams struggle to justify |
| Lever | ~$6,000/yr for small teams (est.) | Lever is best for recruiting teams at companies with 100 to 1,000 employees that source passive candidates as a core hiring strategy and need CRM functionality integrated into their ATS. | Lever pricing is not transparent, giving the vendor negotiation advantage over buyers |
| iCIMS | ~$6-$9 per employee/mo (est.) | iCIMS is best for enterprise companies with 1,000+ employees that hire at high volume, meaning 500+ hires per year across multiple locations, business units, or geographies. It fits healthcare systems, retail chains, manufacturing companies, financial institutions, and large services organizations where recruiting means processing tens of thousands of applications across diverse job categories. | iCIMS implementation takes three to six months and requires significant configuration |
| SmartRecruiters | From $14,995/yr (Essential) | SmartRecruiters is best for enterprise companies that want to build a best-of-breed talent acquisition stack rather than accepting a single vendor's built-in tools. It fits organizations with 1,000+ employees and strong opinions about which sourcing, assessment, video interviewing, and background check tools they use, companies that want the ATS to be the connective tissue, not the entire toolkit. | SmartRecruiters marketplace flexibility creates integration management overhead |
| Tracker | quote only | Best for staffing and recruiting agencies that want recruiting software with deep ATS+CRM coverage across candidate, client, and placement workflows. | The tradeoff is that Tracker is built for agency reality first, so purely internal recruiting teams may find it heavier than they need. |
| AvaHR | $119/month, or $99/month billed annually | Best for SMB teams that want recruiting software focused on job distribution, collaborative review, and straightforward hiring-manager participation. | The tradeoff is that AvaHR is optimized for ease and speed more than for complex enterprise process design. |
| Recruiterflow | $99/user/month | Recruiterflow is best for recruiting agencies with 5 to 100 recruiters that manage 10 to 100 concurrent job orders and need a purpose-built ATS and CRM that handles both the candidate and client sides of agency operations in a single platform. | Recruiterflow at $149 per seat adds up quickly for growing agencies |
Want this recruiting software shortlist kept current?
We re-check every price on this page against the vendor's own rate card. Leave an email and we will tell you when a figure here moves.